观察执行计划可以看到，先后对T_WITH表进行了4次全表扫描，并产生了5529个逻辑读。下面看看WITH语句的表现:

SQL> WITH
2 AGG AS (SELECT MAX(ID) MAX, MIN(ID) MIN, TRUNC(AVG(ID)) AVG FROM T_WITH)
3 SELECT ID, NAME FROM T_WITH
4 WHERE ID IN
5 (
6 SELECT MAX FROM AGG
7 UNION ALL
8 SELECT MIN FROM AGG
9 UNION ALL
10 SELECT AVG FROM AGG
11 );

ID NAME
---------- ------------------------------
1 STANDARD
50000 DBMS_BACKUP_RESTORE
100000 INITJVMAUX

已用时间: 00: 00: 00.07

执行计划
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 1033356310

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 3 | 129 |
| 1 | TEMP TABLE TRANSFORMATION | | | |
| 2 | LOAD AS SELECT | T_WITH | | |
| 3 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 13 |
| 4 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T_WITH | 112K| 1429K|
|* 5 | HASH JOIN | | 3 | 129 |
| 6 | VIEW | VW_NSO_1 | 3 | 39 |
| 7 | HASH UNIQUE | | 3 | 39 |
| 8 | UNION-ALL | | | |
| 9 | VIEW | | 1 | 13 |
| 10 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SYS_TEMP_0FD9D662E_BF2EDF12 | 1 | 13 |
| 11 | VIEW | | 1 | 13 |
| 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SYS_TEMP_0FD9D662E_BF2EDF12 | 1 | 13 |
| 13 | VIEW | | 1 | 13 |
| 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SYS_TEMP_0FD9D662E_BF2EDF12 | 1 | 13 |
| 15 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T_WITH | 112K| 3299K|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------

5 - access("ID"="$nso_col_1")

Note
-----
- dynamic sampling used for this statement

统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
2 recursive calls
8 db block gets
2776 consistent gets
1 physical reads
648 redo size
543 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
385 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
3 rows processed

　　观察这次的执行计划，发现只对T_WITH表进行了两次全表扫描，而从逻辑读上也可以观察到，这次只产生了2776的逻辑读，正好是上面不使用WITH语句的一半。

　　通过分析执行计划，Oracle执行了WITH子查询一次，并将结果放到了临时表中，在随后对子查询的多次访问中，都从临时表中直接读取了数据，这应该也是那1个物理读的由来。

　　通过上面的例子可以看到，将子查询放到WITH语句中不仅可以简化查询语句的结构，对于子查询需要多次执行的情况，还有可能提示查询的性能。

　　可惜的是，WITH语句只能用在SELECT语句中，UPDATE和DELETE语句不支持WITH语法:

SQL> SET AUTOT OFF
SQL> SET TIMING OFF
SQL> WITH SUBQ AS (SELECT 1 FROM DUAL)
2 SELECT ID, NAME FROM T_WITH WHERE ID IN (SELECT * FROM SUBQ);
ID NAME
---------- ------------------------------
1 STANDARD
SQL> WITH SUBQ AS (SELECT 1 FROM DUAL)
2 UPDATE T_WITH SET ID = 1 WHERE ID IN (SELECT * FROM SUBQ);
UPDATE T_WITH SET ID = 1 WHERE ID IN (SELECT * FROM SUBQ)
*第 2 行出现错误:
ORA-00928: 缺失 SELECT 关键字
SQL> WITH SUBQ AS (SELECT 1 FROM DUAL)
2 DELETE T_WITH WHERE ID IN (SELECT * FROM SUBQ);
DELETE T_WITH WHERE ID IN (SELECT * FROM SUBQ)
*第 2 行出现错误:
ORA-00928: 缺失 SELECT 关键字